The Respectable Burgher on "The Higher Criticism" (*)
Since Reverend Doctors now declare
That clerks and people must prepare
To doubt if Adam ever were;
To hold the flood a local scare;
To argue, though the stolid stare,
That everything had happened ere
The prophets to its happening sware;
That David was no giant-slayer,
Nor one to call a God-obeyer
In certain details we could spare,
But rather was a debonair
Shrewd bandit, skilled as banjo-player:
That Solomon sang the fleshly Fair,
And gave the Church no thought whate'er;
That Esther with her royal wear,
And Mordecai, the son of Jair,
And Joshua's triumphs, Job's despair,
And Balaam's ass's bitter blare;
Nebuchadnezzar's furnace-flare,
And Daniel and the den affair,
And other stories rich and rare,
Were writ to make old doctrine wear
Something of a romantic air:
That the Nain widow's only heir,
And Lazarus with cadaverous glare
(As done in oils by Piombo's care)
Did not return from Sheol's lair:
That Jael set a fiendish snare,
That Pontius Pilate acted square,
That never a sword cut Malchus' ear
And (but for shame I must forbear)
That -- -- did not reappear! . . . (**)
- Since thus they hint, nor turn a hair,
All churchgoing will I forswear,
And sit on Sundays in my chair,
And read that moderate man Voltaire. (***)
(*)'The Higher Criticism'
was/is a school of theology, which I
believe came from Germany, which came out at around the same time as
Origin of Species. It sought to explain away the Bible miracles to
fit in with 'modern science', perhaps so that it would be
easier to believe. There is an atheistic American bishop by the name
of John
Shelby Spong, thankfully now retired (like our own heretic bishop David
Jenkins of Durham who denied the resurrection) who similarly has denied
the miraculous in Christianity. These 'modern' churchmen seem to hope that a more 'modern' or
'contemporary' or 'relevant' or whatever Christianity would
be more likely to catch on, although I'm not clear why they would want it
to! Those who water
down the message to
try to avoid criticism fall between two stools-they try to please
everyone (except the Bible believers) and end up pleasing no-one (except Satan).
And his useful fools the atheists-who laugh as 'bishops' do their job for them, and
the Jihadi Muslims-who move into the spiritual vacuum and recruit the
people who are looking for God but are put off Christianity by wishy
washy bishops who are embarrassed by their own holy book and who would
damn Jesus of Nazareth as a superstitious reactionary bigot and petty
magician if He came today. Read C S Lewis's book 'Miracles' which
explains beautiufully why miracles are not an intellectual, theological
or scientific problem (given a God who is real) and why it's stupid and
pointless to try to remove the miraculous from Christianity.
The poem begins rejecting Adam, and ends rejecting Christ, the
'Second Adam'. The point is that if priests and preachers tell us that
Genesis and other Old Testament stories are not literally true but
merely fables, then probably so is the New Testament and the
Resurrection, so why bother with the Christian religion at all? That is
a road which has been taken by many. Evolution has been described as 'the
most powerful engine of atheism ever invented' and so it is. How
comfortable does that make you feel, brother and sister Christian?
Biblical Christianity and evolution don't mix, and I wish that we
Christians understood that as well as the enemies of our faith so clearly do. May as well be hanged for a creationist sheep as a ressurectionist lamb.
return to main menu